|

I consider myself to be a buy-and-hold
investor. I tend to buy stocks for long periods of time 10 years or
longer is my typical holding period. I happen to believe that buying stocks
for the long term is the best way to build wealth in the stock market. The
tax system is too onerous on short-term gains to be trading stocks.
Having said that, I realize that buy-and-hold
investing does not always provide big returns during all market periods. In
fact, selling some stocks would have saved me a lot of money over the last
few years.
For that reason, I think it makes perfect
sense to balance out a predominately buy-and-hold portfolio with a smaller
portion of investment funds focused on different investment strategies. If
you think about it, it is one more way to diversify a portfolio. After all,
we diversify investment portfolios across and within asset classes. Why not
diversify them further across different investment styles?
What I like about balancing a long-term
investment strategy with a worst-to-first strategy is that you will be
forced, in part of your portfolio, to take some profits off the table each
year (providing, of course, the strategy does its job that year). Taking
profits is not necessarily a bad thing and can be a very good thing during
choppy market periods, when short-term strategies tend to do better than
long-term strategies.

|